You could say it’s a cute movie with a cute fairy tale. But, in all honesty, I actually was a little disturbed by this only because of my recognition of social, spiritual trend of our western world. Playing off of this modernists ideal of the world left to be discovered and thus conquered, the message, seems to promote the audience to embrace what has been taught as evil and dark. Along the process, good and evil becomes muddled up and what was once held as evil [feared] is embraced, while what was once held as good [embraced] is shunned. Two scenes that really drives the point—
1. When the dead are walking the earth, a child, thru curiosity, recognizes his dead grandfather and embraces him.
2. The skeletal figure is the embodiment of wise and gentle elder, rather than an austere pastor who is powerless and detached a personal needs of people.
3. The living world, w/ repressed 19th c. Victorian setting, w/ the church as the main spiritual powerhouse is portrayed as dull, colorless and thus lifeless. On the other hand, the dead world, with the dark magic is portrayed as exciting, colorful and thus full of life.
Am I being too close-minded? Well, as a follower of JC and lover of good stories, I realize that there ‘must’ a line in somewhere – I do love good stories even if they don’t come from Bible. I grew up w/ fairy tales, most of which were not from non-Christian worldview, origins and traditions. The difference is that there was clear-cut distinction between good and evil! It seems as if this modern day fascination w/ magic and witchcraft, and this blending of evil and good seems to be product of postmodern outlook where there is absence objective morality. Beauty is detached from goodness/morals and ends up being attached arbitrarily to anyone’s preference.
What really bothers me is my recognition of modern world and her media w/ inaccurate portrait of spiritual leaders of the past, in this case, puritan pastors. Is it any wonder that when secular education talks about J. Edwards, they only focus on one sermon – Sinner in the hands of angry God’? – he wrote bunch of other stuff too, you know… When they talk about Puritanism, they are so quick to bring out what went wrong with Salem Witch Hunt, w/ the implied accusation that it was the Christian superstitious mindset that brought about such abuse.
How about the obliteration of the culture thru missions work, without talking bringing out the mindset of unbelieving anthropologists, basing their attitude on theory of evolution as they looked on to the people of other continents as ‘almost-a-human-being-but-not-quite-there-yet’ attitudes? Oh, how about talking about the abuse of the church w/out bringing out the obliteration and destruction that were caused by persons w/ atheistic evolutionary mindset – Stalin and Hitler? Hitler might have used Luther’s hatred of the Jews to justify his holocaust, but he was more influenced by nihilistic outlook of Nietzsche and atheistic evolutionary theory. Somehow these kinds of facts conveniently disappear when people talk against the abuse of religion, mainly Christianity.

